sabidoo
Number of posts : 2069 Age : 56 Localisation : Carthage, TN Registration date : 2007-04-28
| Subject: His Majesty, Obama Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:44 pm | |
| - Quote :
- Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution
Conservative News and Reporting "News for the Rest of Us" Michele Chang
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition. A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.
"The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." the spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution."
The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes to far. "Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy." the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass."
Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear. "The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib."
"We expect a lot of flak over this," ! the classified memo continues. "But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control." The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years. link-CLICK-link | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: His Majesty, Obama Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:22 am | |
| You had me worried for a second. |
|
Just_Sue
Number of posts : 811 Age : 57 Localisation : North Carolina Registration date : 2008-04-03
| Subject: Re: His Majesty, Obama Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:06 pm | |
| Snopes.com says 'false' to this, but i dont doubt that if Obama gets wind of it, he'll see it as a good idea. | |
|
sabidoo
Number of posts : 2069 Age : 56 Localisation : Carthage, TN Registration date : 2007-04-28
| Subject: Re: His Majesty, Obama Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:57 pm | |
| - Just_Sue wrote:
- Snopes.com says 'false' to this, but i dont doubt that if Obama gets wind of it, he'll see it as a good idea.
Rather than wasting time on socialismrawks snopes.com, you could have just read the entire page that I linked you to. | |
|
Staybrite
Number of posts : 23657 Age : 56 Localisation : Arizona Desert Registration date : 2007-02-08
| Subject: Re: His Majesty, Obama Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:30 pm | |
| Unfortunately this smacks too much of something that could very well be true. It seems too close to the truth to be satircal. I would have thought it was real if it came from the AP. It may be a joke now, but I won't be surprised to see it as "policy" in two years. _________________ "I used to be indecisive.......... Now I'm not sure."
| |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: His Majesty, Obama | |
| |
|